Top Architecture Firms: Comparing the Best Options

Can a small studio outthink a giant practice regarding real results on projects and sustainability? We ask that upfront because choices today must balance design intent with measurable performance.

We frame our comparison around how firms deliver in real operations, not only in renderings. Our view blends revenue lists, editorial curation, and hands-on evaluation of teams, planning, and delivery.

Data matters: a few market leaders report very large revenues, yet boutique studios often win on tailored solutions and client-fit. We keep New York and national market leaders in scope while highlighting why a focused studio like Andi Korita Studio can excel on customized, design-forward work.

Readers will learn how we judge projects across sectors, from offices to healthcare, and why early integration of sustainability and systems reduces risk. This introduction sets expectations so clients can choose a practice that aligns design, planning, and delivery with real goals.

Key Takeaways

• We compare firms by design quality, performance, and delivery outcomes.
• Revenue lists help, but strategy and team capability drive project success.
• Net-zero and systems planning must start early to lower risk.
• Boutique studios can outperform on tailored, design-forward projects.
• Clients should seek proof: modeled versus actual results on energy and commissioning.

How We Define the Best: Criteria for Evaluating Architecture and Design Firms

Our evaluation focuses on measurable delivery: how teams translate intent into operating results. We look beyond rankings to see if a practice converts design into verified performance on real projects.

Design quality, business performance, and commitment form our core pillars. We weigh creative leadership alongside change-order history and schedule discipline to judge whether a firm can deliver on promise.

Sector reach and technical capability

We assess sector specialization, experience with institutions, and geographic reach, including New York offices. Technology maturity—BIM standards, parametric tools, and data workflows—reduces coordination risk and improves systems integration.

• Team depth: clear roles from concept to construction.
• Community planning: proactive engagement for approvals and sensitive urban design contexts.
• Performance proof: modeled EUI, carbon targets, and post-occupancy verification.

Criteria	What we check	Why it matters
Design & Delivery	Portfolio, constructibility, change orders	Predictable timelines and cost control
Technology	BIM, parametric, data tools	Lower coordination risk on complex projects
Client outcomes	Post-occupancy data, commissioning	Verified performance for owners and occupants

The Journal of the American Institute of Architects scoring influences our view—only a few names appear across revenue lists and the Architect 50. Later, we explain why a boutique option like Andi Korita Studio can be the right match for customized, design-forward work.

Best Architecture Firms: What Clients in the United States Are Searching For

Search queries show owners want teams that tie design decisions to real-world performance and operating costs. We track what clients type when they look for partners for commercial, healthcare, education, and high-impact interiors projects.

Commercial, healthcare, education, and interiors priorities

Clients focus on measurable outcomes: energy targets, occupant health, and long-term adaptability. Offices and institutions want daylighting strategies, acoustic control, and durable finishes that support brand goals.

Net-zero goals, electrification readiness, and embodied carbon

Owners increasingly require electrification-ready systems and lower embodied carbon. Early planning shifts materials, envelope performance, and mechanical selection. These choices reduce risk as codes based on the IECC tighten.

• Transparent proof: modeled vs. code energy performance and post-occupancy feedback.
• Interiors expertise matters for furniture systems, finish durability, and user satisfaction.
• Adaptability: future-proof planning for evolving energy and wellness standards.

“Clients value a nimble team that blends tailored interiors with technical rigor to deliver verified results.”

Why a boutique approach can help: A small studio often moves faster on decisions, aligns planning and design tightly, and customizes solutions for specialty healthcare and education spaces. In markets from New York to regional centers, that focus delivers projects that perform.

The US Landscape: Top Architecture Firms by Revenue and Reach

Revenue numbers tell a story about capacity, but they don’t show how projects perform in use. We list scale to help clients understand who can handle large delivery loads and multi‑market work.

The top U.S. firms by annual revenue include Gensler ($1.3B), HNTB ($693M), Perkins & Will ($595M), HKS ($308M), CallisonRTKL ($285M), Perkins Eastman ($264M), LPA ($222M), NELSON Worldwide ($209M), NBBJ ($202M), and Corgan ($200M).

Firm	Revenue (USD)	Major offices
Gensler	$1.3B	New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco
HNTB	$693M	New York, regional hubs
Perkins & Will	$595M	New York, Chicago

Scale brings advantages: more staff, wider geographic coverage, and the ability to run multiple large projects at once. That reach benefits complex institutional work and national rollouts.

But revenue is a proxy for scale, not for verified design outcomes. Only a few high‑revenue names appear on combined design and sustainability rankings — Gensler, LMN, and HKS — showing that profitability per person and measured performance matter as much as size.

“Clients should read revenue lists alongside post‑occupancy data and commissioning records to judge true delivery.”

We will later use case comparisons to show when a large practice is the right choice and when a focused studio can provide better value and tighter performance on a specific project.

A Closer Look at Market Leaders and Their Specialties

Market leaders show how scale, cross‑discipline teams, and repeated delivery shape high‑impact projects. We review which groups handle multi‑sector programs and where specialized know‑how matters most.

Global firms with multi‑sector portfolios

Gensler operates across the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Asia, and Australia, serving 3,500+ active clients. Their reach lets a single design firm staff large, phased programs across time zones.

Why it helps: consistent standards, repeatable workflows, and deep planning capacity improve coordination on offices, institutions, and urban design work.

Infrastructure and transportation focus

HNTB concentrates on airports, bridges, tunnels, and transit. That focus translates to technical teams and delivery systems tuned for heavy civil projects.

Specialized practice reduces schedule and cost risk when complex permitting and long‑lead equipment dominate a program.

Healthcare, interiors, and education excellence

Perkins Eastman is known for healthcare; LPA has surpassed AIA 2030 targets for energy reduction. These groups pair clinical and educational code expertise with strong interior design execution.

We see award patterns recognized by the American Institute of Architects and major publications that track consistent design and delivery quality.

• Global leaders balance planning and delivery at scale for multi‑market projects.
• Infrastructure specialists bring the technical depth needed for transport systems.
• Healthcare and education teams convert program needs into constructible, high‑performance packages.
• Smaller, focused studios complement larger practices on interiors, branded spaces, and highly customized environments.

“Large and boutique practices can be complementary: scale for complex delivery, studios for tailored interiors and specialty work.”

Spotlight: Sustainability and the Net-Zero Imperative

Sustainability now guides design decisions and budget choices across small studios and large practices alike.

We track measurable commitments that separate talk from results. LPA has surpassed the AIA 2030 Commitment target with more than a 70% cut in energy use. NBBJ holds a CarbonNeutral company certification. These records show how policy and practice combine to lower risk on real projects.

Commitments that matter

Measurable targets such as AIA 2030 and CarbonNeutral certification prove a firm’s focus. We value firms that publish modeled EUI and post-occupancy data.

Design strategies that reduce energy use

High-performance envelopes, exterior shading, right-sized glazing, and efficient systems cut energy and improve comfort. Early modeling lets teams tune systems to climate and use patterns for reliable gains.

• Model scenarios early to calibrate mechanical size and controls.
• Prioritize envelope and passive strategies before adding tech.
• Link sustainability wins to lifecycle cost and resilience.

“Boutique studios can deliver targeted, measurable performance on smaller and mid-size programs.”

Commitment	Example	Impact on projects
AIA 2030	LPA: >70% energy reduction	Lower EUI, better compliance in New York and regional work
CarbonNeutral	NBBJ: company certification	Net-zero operations strategy across offices, from San Francisco to Los Angeles
Boutique studio playbook	Andi Korita Studio (example scale)	Fast decisions, tailored systems for interiors and renovations

Global Perspective: Best Architecture Across the World Right Now

Global studios shape trends that U.S. clients can apply when choosing a partner for complex projects.

Editorially curated standouts and award-winning studios

Editorial lists such as Archello pick names based on portfolio quality, awards, and material innovation.

Notable examples include MAD, OMA, SOM, MVRDV, Zaha Hadid Architects, and Perkins&Will. Their projects and offices influence practice around the world.

Innovation drivers: material systems, resilience, and people-first design

We see three clear drivers: material systems integration, resilience thinking, and people-first spaces.

Material innovation reduces embodied carbon and improves durability. Resilience planning addresses climate risk. People-first design raises user comfort and productivity.

“A curated list helps clients link global inspiration to practical delivery.”

• Curated lists show evidence: awards, sustainability data, and built work.
• These global models inform planning for New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco projects.
• Research-driven teams bring cross-border lessons to local community and urban design challenges.

Regional Focus: Top Architecture Firms in Houston and Why They Excel

Lessons learned in Houston turn weather risk into design requirements that protect budgets and long-term performance.

Climate-smart envelopes, dehumidification, and resilient MEP strategy

Envelope choices matter: high-performance glazing, thermal breaks, and shading reduce cooling loads and control moisture. We prioritize dehumidification strategies that keep interiors healthy and avoid mold in humid conditions.

Drainage, detention, and floodplain coordination post-Atlas-14

Post-Harvey rules and Atlas-14 rainfall updates raised detention and finished-floor standards. We coordinate early with floodplain officials to lock elevations and detention needs into planning.

Procurement realities: long-lead items and value engineering

Owners must budget long-lead switchgear, AHUs, and curtainwall early. Strong procurement strategy and VE guardrails protect design intent while keeping schedules on track.

• Houston’s climate makes envelope and MEP resilience mandatory for project performance.
• Early floodplain coordination reduces approval risk under Atlas-14 rules.
• Plan for long-lead engineering buys; align VE to preserve core systems.

“Top teams in Houston turn climate risk into requirements before design sketches are final.”

We offer a hiring checklist clients can adapt anywhere: site/water, envelope/heat, MEP/resilience, structure/soils, approvals, and budget/buys. With the right strategy and integrated engineering, aesthetic goals and performance go hand in hand—whether you hire a large studio or a boutique practice.

Client Playbook: How to Compare an Architecture Firm’s Process and Proof

Clients need a simple checklist that separates confident claims from verifiable delivery on real projects. We focus on process, evidence, and post‑occupancy follow‑through so you can compare options clearly.

Request these baseline items:

• Three recent projects with modeled EUI versus code baselines and actual commissioning reports.
• A one‑page flood and drainage narrative that shows site water strategy and approvals thinking.
• A long‑lead procurement plan for equipment and curtainwall to reveal schedule risk.

Modeled EUI vs. code and commissioning plans

Ask how modeled energy numbers were validated during commissioning. We want to see how controls, metering, and handover plans close the loop.

Change‑order history, warranties, and post‑occupancy data

Compare change‑order rates on similar projects, warranty responsiveness, and post‑occupancy surveys. These data show whether a team documents coordination and supports building operations.

“A boutique studio can document equal or better proof than large practices when process and verification are prioritized.”

Scoring tip: rate each firm on EUI accuracy, water and drainage clarity, procurement planning, and POE follow‑through. This playbook reveals the best architecture firms and studios that protect budgets and outcomes—whether you hire a national office in New York or a boutique group serving San Francisco and Los Angeles markets.

Editors’ Shortlist: Firms Demonstrating Design Excellence and Scale

Our editors compile a short list to show who moves large programs while keeping people at the center of design. We favor groups that shape urban design and produce reliable, well‑executed projects.

Global studios influencing culture and urbanism

Gensler earns attention for global reach and user‑centered commercial and institutional projects. Perkins & Will shows depth in healthcare and education with people‑focused planning and resilient delivery.

Interiors, branded environments, and user-centered experience

We look for teams that translate strategy into human environments. High‑quality interior design and branded spaces improve occupant comfort and operational outcomes.

• Portfolios that influence community and urban design
• Offices able to scale while staying nimble on interiors and fit‑outs
• Recognition by the American Institute of Architects and inclusion on top lists

Practice	Strength	How they complement boutiques
Gensler	Global delivery, commercial projects	Scale for multi‑city rollouts; pairs with studios for custom interiors
Perkins & Will	Healthcare & education planning	Technical depth supports institutional clients and fit‑out teams
Selected studios	Branded interiors, bespoke work	Fast decisions, tailored systems for renovations and small projects

“We value a balance: scale for complex delivery, and specialist teams for tailored, human-centered spaces.”

Andi Korita Studio: A Boutique Global Option for Architecture and Interior Design

Andi Korita Studio brings a focused, hands-on approach that matches craft to measurable project outcomes. Based in Tirana, Albania and founded in 2010 by architect Andi Korita, we deliver tailored solutions for clients who value clarity and material precision.

About

We are an architecture and interior design studio with 15+ years of experience creating beautiful, functional spaces. Our team pairs principal involvement with detailed documentation so design intent becomes built reality.

What we deliver

We produce custom environments and interiors that reflect program needs, context, and budget. Our process begins with listening, then moves to strategic planning, detailing, and construction support.

• Principal-led service from concept through construction administration.
• Custom detailing and material integration suited to each project.
• Documentation, coordination, and commissioning to reduce risk at handover.

Contact

Connect with us to discuss projects requiring a customized, design-forward approach: +355 68 408 8672 | architect@andikorita.com

Why choose Andi Korita Studio? Our boutique focus complements large-scale teams by delivering personalized attention, refined interiors, and technical detailing that protect client goals.

Feature	What we provide	Client benefit
Principal involvement	Direct oversight at key milestones	Fewer revisions, clearer decisions
Design & detailing	Custom materials and joinery standards	Durability and craft-focused finish
Performance support	Coordination, documentation, commissioning	Lower operational risk and smoother handover

Comparing Large Global Firms vs. Specialized Studios

We compare delivery models to show how scale and agility change outcomes on projects.

Large global firms bring deep staffing, multiple offices, and repeatable systems. They handle multi‑campus programs, heavy engineering coordination, and global rollouts that require strict planning and process control.

Specialized studios offer fast decision cycles, principal access, and tailored interiors. For renovation, branded spaces, and experiential work, a focused design firm can save time and protect design intent.

Business tradeoffs matter: overhead and staffing models affect fees, schedule velocity, and change‑order risk. We point clients in New York, San Francisco, and Los Angeles to match scope to delivery capacity.

“Pairing reach with intimacy often delivers the best project outcomes.”

• When to choose scale: multi‑site rollouts, complex MEP, and heavy permitting.
• When to choose a studio: quick turnarounds, bespoke joinery, and intense client collaboration.
• Hybrid approach: combine a global office for systems with a boutique studio for interiors and detailing.

Model	Strength	Ideal projects
Large firm	Capacity & systems	Campus rollouts, urban design
Specialized studio	Agility & craft	Interiors, fast renovations
Hybrid	Balanced focus	Complex projects needing custom detail

Sectors That Benefit Most from Integrated Architecture and Interior Design

When interiors and building design move in step, measurable gains in productivity and wellbeing follow. We see this clearly across corporate workplaces, healthcare environments, and education spaces.

Corporate workplaces, healthcare environments, and education spaces

Corporate workplaces gain faster decision cycles when adjacencies, acoustics, and daylighting are planned together. This reduces change orders and helps teams meet branding and operational targets.

Healthcare environments rely on coordinated layout, infection prevention, and durable finishes. Close collaboration between architects and interior design teams improves wayfinding and clinical workflows.

Education spaces need flexibility and maintainability. Integrated planning lets institutions fit adaptable systems, resilient materials, and clear circulation that support learning and community use.

• Systems coordination: MEP routes and finishes are aligned to reduce on-site clashes.
• Performance drivers: acoustics, daylight control, and hygiene strategies are designed together.
• Long-term value: durable materials and adaptable layouts lower lifecycle costs for institutions.

“Projects that pair spatial planning with interiors consistently support people, operations, and measurable outcomes.”

From Concept to Construction: Selecting the Right Design Partner

A successful project hinges on early alignment between designers, engineers, and contractors. We advise owners to start by clarifying goals, schedule, and budget so shortlists match capacity to scope.

Begin with a simple vetting routine: confirm experience on similar building types, climate conditions, and approvals paths. Prioritize teams that show principal access and steady delivery records.

• Run concept-phase strategy workshops with MEP engineers, contractors, and utilities to flag risks early.
• Hold pre-permit roundtables and survey work to remove surprises that add months downstream.
• Balance portfolio prestige with day-to-day delivery capacity and principal involvement.

We often shortlist a boutique studio like Andi Korita when projects need high-touch decision-making and crafted interiors. For larger rollouts, pair a global office for systems with a focused design firm for finishes and detailing.

“Test fit with a paid concept sprint to validate approach, team chemistry, and decision cadence.”

Step	What to check	Why it matters
Goals & scope	Program, timeline, budget	Aligns expectations
Early workshops	MEP, contractor, utility input	Reduces change orders
Pilot sprint	Paid concept study	Validates fit and strategy

Sustainability, Strategy, and Systems: Making Performance Measurable

A clear measurement plan turns sustainability goals into executable tasks for designers, engineers, and operators. We ask teams to set concrete targets at kickoff so every decision links to an agreed outcome.

Setting targets for energy, wellness, and carbon from day one

Define acceptance criteria: state target EUI, embodied carbon thresholds, and occupant wellness metrics in the program. Put these metrics in contracts and tie them to milestones.

We recommend simple dashboards and monthly checkpoints to track progress during design and construction. This keeps scope, cost, and constructibility visible.

Aligning architecture, engineering, and operations

Cross-discipline alignment matters. Architects, MEP engineers, and facilities managers must agree on control strategies, metering locations, and handover responsibilities early.

Leaders document targets at project outset and verify them through commissioning and post-occupancy evaluation. Even a boutique partner can deliver this rigor with principal-led coordination and clear data handoff.

• Set targets and acceptance tests at kickoff.
• Require metering and linked commissioning plans.
• Use POE to validate EUI and occupant health after handover.

“We verify modeled energy against measured results and close gaps through tuned controls and operator training.”

Action	Why it matters	Who leads
Target setting (EUI, carbon, wellness)	Guides design trade-offs and procurement	Design lead & owner
Commissioning plan & meters	Ensures systems perform as intended	Engineer & commissioning agent
Post-occupancy evaluation	Validates outcomes and informs adjustments	Operations & consultant team

Balance matters: align sustainability ambitions with cost and constructibility so schedules in New York, San Francisco, or Los Angeles stay on track. Measurable strategy builds resilience, reduces lifecycle risk, and creates long-term value for owners and the community.

How to Build a Shortlist: Questions to Ask and Red Flags to Avoid

We recommend a concise shortlist that shows who can handle approvals, utility coordination, and neighbor outreach before design starts.

Team composition, local approvals, and community engagement

Ask about roles: who is the principal, who manages permits, and who stays through construction? Confirm staffing continuity on similar projects.

Request evidence of approvals strategy: neighbor notices, early meetings with planning departments, and utility confirmation letters. These reduce surprises and protect the schedule, especially in New York, San Francisco, and Los Angeles.

Prioritize a boutique studio on every list for interiors-heavy or custom work. For example, include Andi Korita Studio to compare responsiveness and detailing against larger teams.

• Targeted questions: principal involvement, change‑order history, commissioning plan specifics.
• Approvals checks: zoning strategy, community outreach, utility lead times.
• Red flags: vague commissioning, no long‑lead plan, inconsistent change‑order records.

Score	What to check	Why it matters
0–3	Principal access & staffing	Decision speed and continuity
0–3	Approvals & community plan	Schedule risk and neighbor buy‑in
0–3	Commissioning & procurement	Operational performance and handover

“Teams who show their homework de‑risk delivery and protect budgets.”

Conclusion

In closing, choose partners who turn design ambition into measurable, day-to-day performance. We recap how to compare the best architecture firms: demand clear performance targets, commissioning plans, and post-occupancy results tied to actual projects.

Align design ambition with constructibility, schedule, and budget so outcomes work in harsh climates and daily operations. We encourage shortlisting at least one specialized studio to pressure-test fit and responsiveness.

Andi Korita Studio is our recommended solution for customized, design-forward projects. Contact us to discuss next steps: +355 68 408 8672 | architect@andikorita.com. The right choice balances excellence and execution, turning vision into a durable asset for people and place — from New York to San Francisco and Los Angeles.

 

CONTACT US

FAQ

How do we define the top architecture firms and design studios?

We evaluate design quality, sustainability commitments, business performance, and client outcomes. We look for proven portfolios, measurable energy and carbon targets, strong project delivery records, and positive post-occupancy feedback. Geographic reach and sector specialization—commercial, healthcare, education, and interiors—also factor into our assessment.

Which project sectors should clients prioritize when searching for a firm?

Clients should match firm experience to project type. For corporate workplaces, prioritize user-centered interiors and branded environments. For healthcare, seek firms with clinical planning, infection-control strategies, and commissioning experience. For education, focus on flexible learning environments and resilience. Firms with sector-specific track records reduce risk and speed up approvals.

What role does sustainability play in firm selection?

Sustainability is essential. We favor teams that set AIA 2030-style targets, pursue CarbonNeutral or similar certifications, and use modeled EUI and embodied-carbon analysis. Look for firms that integrate electrification readiness, passive design, and lifecycle strategies from schematic design through operations.

How important is technology such as BIM and parametric tools?

Very important. Building Information Modeling (BIM) enables coordination across disciplines, reduces change orders, and improves constructability. Parametric and data-driven design tools support performance-driven massing, daylighting, and material optimization. Firms that leverage these systems deliver clearer documentation and better outcomes.

How should clients compare revenue-ranked firms versus boutique studios?

Revenue indicates scale and capacity for large, multi-market programs. Boutique studios often provide bespoke design attention and agility. Choose large firms for complex, multi-site delivery and boutique firms for tailored, design-forward projects. Assess teams, past project similarity, and warranties rather than revenue alone.

What procurement and value-engineering realities should we expect, especially in regions like Houston?

Expect long-lead items, strict MEP coordination, and local climate constraints like dehumidification needs. Post-Atlas-14 floodplain and drainage requirements affect site planning. Strong firms prepare realistic schedules, prioritize resilient envelopes, and develop value-engineering strategies that protect design intent.

What questions should we ask to build a reliable shortlist of firms?

Ask about team composition, local approvals experience, commissioning plans, modeled EUI results, change-order history, and post-occupancy performance data. Request references for similar projects and examples of community engagement and permitting success.

How do we verify a firm’s post-occupancy performance and warranties?

Request post-occupancy evaluation (POE) reports, commissioning records, and maintenance handover documentation. Ask for warranty terms and examples where firms addressed operational issues. Firms that track occupant satisfaction and energy use provide stronger proof of performance.

Which global firms lead on multi-sector portfolios and infrastructure work?

Industry leaders with broad portfolios often include teams focused on urban planning, transportation, and large-scale mixed-use projects. These firms combine architecture, engineering, and planning expertise to deliver complex infrastructure and civic programs across regions.

How do we balance design excellence with cost and schedule constraints?

Start with clear performance goals and a realistic budget. Use staged decision-making, integrate cost consultants early, and require value-engineering options that preserve core design ideas. Firms that model EUI and coordinate tightly with contractors reduce surprises and schedule risk.

What makes a firm a good fit for healthcare or education projects?

For healthcare, prioritize clinical workflow planning, infection control, resilient MEP systems, and commissioning expertise. For education, value flexible classrooms, daylighting strategies, and resilient site design. Look for documented outcomes in similar programs and user-centered design approaches.

How do we evaluate a firm’s commitment to net-zero and carbon reduction?

Request their carbon-reduction roadmap, examples of net-zero or near-zero projects, and evidence of embodied-carbon accounting. Confirm they set measurable targets and use energy modeling early in design. Partnerships with engineering teams and operations professionals help ensure delivery.

What are common red flags when selecting a design partner?

Watch for unclear team roles, limited local permitting experience, vague deliverables, poor documentation examples, and lack of performance data. High change-order histories, weak commissioning plans, and no post-occupancy follow-up are also warning signs.

How can we assess a firm’s approach to interiors and branded environments?

Review case studies that show user experience, material selection, and integration with brand strategy. Ask for sample furniture and finish schedules, workplace strategy outcomes, and client testimonials about occupant satisfaction and productivity gains.

What should we expect during the concept-to-construction process?

Expect iterative design milestones, performance modeling, permitting, contractor coordination, and commissioning. Good firms provide clear schedules, risk registers, and communication protocols. Early alignment on scope, budget, and deliverables keeps projects on track.